Two positive unintended outcomes discovered in this study are an increased confidence by ministry officials using DRVT products and the potential for strengthened intra-governmental cooperation. These relationships result in a project where very few stones are left unturned and every possible avenue is explored, leading to the best possible outcomes, which have great potential to remain long after funding ends. A NIWA project staff member summed it up beautifully by saying, “We always do much more than the donor organization requires, but it helps our partners tremendously and we enjoy doing it.” For their part, country officials voice their strong and positive working relationships with NIWA. Project results look very likely to be sustained after Phase II ends, mostly because of the commitment both sides show to these partnerships. All involved express respect and gratitude to fellow partnership members and are keenly interested in achieving results in-country. The most critical factor in access to and use of the DRVT is the unique partnership between NIWA and partner country officials. One partner country was recovering from the largest tropical cyclone on record to make landfall in that country during Phase I project implementation and did not show access and use to the extent of the other two however, that is expected to change during Phase II. What are the unintended consequences – positive and/or negative – of project implementation?įindings showed that NIWA is achieving both access to and use of its DRVT in partner countries. ![]() To what extent are the results reported in response to question 1 sustainable? Improving capacity of local beneficiaries in applying the new tool and 5. Considering gender in project implementation 4. Improving capacity among the community to develop the new tool 3. Developing tool in response to local demand 2. Which of the output-level results are most critical to decision-maker access to and utilization of the DRVT? (Please note that CF output-level results are: 1. To what extent is NIWA achieving CF logic model results at the outcome and purpose levels in Solomon Islands, Samoa and Fiji? (Please note that these results refer to access and use of the toolkit.) It addressed the following four theory-based evaluation questions: The first assessment will take place in October 2017 and all applications will be reviewed on a 6-monthly basis thereafter.This performance evaluation using Case Study design and qualitative methods focused on the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research’s (NIWA) Challenge Fund (CF) Drought Risk Visualization Toolkit (DRVT) project in Solomon Islands, Samoa and Fiji. UK Aid Direct operates in the lowest 50 countries in the Human Development Index and in countries DFID considers to be of high or moderate fragility.įor further information and to apply, visit: or email. The Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) is part of UK Aid Direct, DFID’s main fund for small and medium sized civil society organisations (CSOs). Grants of up to £50,000 will be available for projects of up to 2 years. Making grants available to support and strengthen the work of small UK registered not-for-profit organisations working in priority countries, to help enhance their capacity and efforts to tackle poverty, and towards achieving the Global Goals. This is a new challenge fund designed to strengthen grassroots development organisations working with the poor, vulnerable and most marginalised. The Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) will support Britain’s small not-for-profit groups to scale-up and increase the reach and efficiency of their projects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |